Cybersecurity

Incident Disclosure Agent

Drafts every notification while the clock is running — and sends none of them

Version 2Published Sep 1, 2026
Watch it work▶ Try it on your own figures — free

4 of 8 incidents missed or are about to miss their notification deadline, 20,560 records involved.

8 incidents checked. 4 are flagged, 20,560 records in total. The longest delay or margin is 31 hours.

Deal with INC-401 first. EU (GDPR) has the most records flagged.

Whether an incident must be notified at all (risk to people) is a legal judgement, not in the data.

20,560
4/8
Incidents flagged
4
8
Records involved
20,560
Longest (hours)
31
Share flagged
50%

Why rows were flagged

4
  • Not notified, deadline passed50%
  • Notified after the deadline25%
  • Not notified, under 24 hours left25%

Value flagged by Jurisdiction

  • EU (GDPR)2
  • UAE1
  • UK1

Items to act on, worst first

ItemJurisdictionValueHours late or leftWhy
INC-401EU (GDPR)12,40031Notified after the deadline
INC-406UAE4,20016Not notified, deadline passed
INC-402EU (GDPR)3,10022Not notified, deadline passed
INC-403UK8602Not notified, under 24 hours left

What to do this week

  • Notify the regulator on INC-401 now: its deadline has passed or is about to.
  • Record why each late notification was late, for the regulator's follow-up.
  • Start the clock at discovery for every new incident and set an alert at 24 hours before the deadline.

Do

  • Fix the highest-risk item first, then run the check again on fresh data.

Don't

  • Don't act on one row alone: open the source record first.

How to improve

  • Add more detail per row (owner, date, source) so the next report can trace each item.
  • Add a second period of data so the next report can show whether things are improving.

Demo

Try it now — free

Type your figures (or fill in samples) and get the answer in a minute.

Start from a template

Make it decision-ready

Also include

No card · no API key · your figures are not stored

Overview

In the hours after an incident, disclosure obligations run on a clock. GDPR allows 72 hours from awareness; other regimes allow less, and contracts often allow less still. Deadlines are missed not from negligence but because the people who know the obligations are the same people containing the breach.

This agent takes the facts as they stand and drafts what has to go out: the regulator notification, the customer notice, the internal brief, and a holding statement for the questions that arrive before the facts are settled. It counts each deadline from the awareness time you give it and shows what remains.

It sends nothing. Every output is a draft for a named human to approve, and that limit is enforced by the agent's permissions rather than its instructions. It also refuses to characterise what happened beyond your stated facts — writing 'no evidence of misuse' before anyone has checked is how a notification becomes a second problem.

Benefits

Drafting removed from the critical hour

Responders contain the incident; the drafts are already waiting.

72h GDPR

Deadlines visible

The 72-hour clock counted rather than remembered.

Nothing overstated under pressure

The reassuring sentence nobody can yet support is never written.

What it does

  • Every audience, one pass

    Regulator, affected customers, internal staff, and a holding statement.

  • Deadlines counted, not recalled

    Each obligation counted from your stated awareness time, with time remaining.

  • Written to your facts only

    No reassurance the facts do not support. What is unconfirmed is labelled unconfirmed.

  • Cannot send

    Drafts only. The send is a human's, enforced by permissions rather than by instruction.

  • Flags what only counsel can decide

    Liability, admission and regulator strategy are routed, never drafted around.

What this changes

What this changes about your week

It takes over
Working out who must be told, by when, under which regime.
Done today by
Counsel and the incident lead, at the worst possible moment.
How often
Rare, and it decides the outcome when it happens.
Typical manual effort
Establishing obligations across jurisdictions is hours you do not have.

Why Cybersecurity in particular. Deadlines run in hours, not days. This is the one agent whose value is entirely in the worst week of your year.

  • Runs unattended

    Started by you or by an event, and it finishes on its own. Nothing waits for someone to be at a desk.

  • The same standard every time

    The two-hundredth item is held to the bar the first one was. Consistency is the part people cannot sustain.

  • It cannot act on its own

    Incident Disclosure Agent has no path to sending, spending or committing. That limit is why its output is safe to act on.

How it runs

This agent runs server-side through the PROMIVO runtime. Each run is logged step by step and every tool call is permission-checked before it executes.

  1. 1InputValidated against the agent input schema
  2. 2Modelclaude-opus-5 with automatic fallback
  3. 3ToolsNo external tools
  4. 4PermissionsRuns READ actions automatically; anything higher waits for approval
  5. 5OutputStructured result matching the output schema
  6. 6LoggingTokens, duration and every step recorded

Requirements

Integrations

No integrations required.

Before you start

  • The facts as known: what happened, when awareness began, what data and how many people
  • Which regimes and contracts apply
  • Requires the All-Access plan or higher

Use cases

Confirmed data incident

Produce the full notification set while containment continues.

Suspected but unconfirmed

Get a holding statement that commits to nothing prematurely.

Tabletop exercises

Rehearse the disclosure path before it is needed.

Pricing

All-Access

Billed monthly through your PROMIVO subscription. Cancel at any time.

Runs consume your plan allowance for agent executions and tokens. See plan limits

FAQ

Can it notify the regulator directly?

No. It drafts; a person sends. Regulatory notification is a legal act with consequences for the organisation and its officers, and it is never automated here.

Is this legal advice?

No. It organises facts against commonly cited timelines and produces drafts for review. Every incident needs counsel; the agent says so in its output and flags what only counsel can decide.

Why will it not say 'no evidence of misuse'?

Because that is a finding, not a fact, and it is usually written before anyone has checked. If your investigation establishes it, supply it as a fact and the agent will use it.

Reviews

Reviews open once customers have run this agent.

Need this agent to work differently?

Tell us what to change and our team will scope a customised version for your business.

Customize this agent