Training & Onboarding Builder
Builds the course from your procedures, and names the ones nobody wrote
5 of 8 modules need attention.
8 modules checked. 5 flagged. The largest gap is 30 days.
Start with Objections. Safety has the most flagged.
Whether a module teaches well is for the trainer; the list only checks objectives, assessments and length.
Why rows were flagged
- No assessment43%
- No learning objective29%
- Longer than 60 minutes29%
Value flagged by Course
- Safety3
- Sales2
Items to act on, worst first
| Item | Course | Value | Minutes over 60 | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Objections | Sales | 1 | 15 | No learning objective, No assessment, Longer than 60 minutes |
| Hazards | Safety | 1 | 0 | No learning objective |
| Drills | Safety | 1 | 30 | Longer than 60 minutes |
| PPE | Safety | 1 | 0 | No assessment |
| Closing | Sales | 1 | 0 | No assessment |
What to do this week
- Resolve Objections first: it is the most urgent on the list.
- Fix the data or the status on every flagged row, then re-run.
- Re-run this check every time the list changes, before it reaches a decision.
Do
- Fix the highest-risk item first, then run the check again on fresh data.
Don't
- Don't act on one row alone: open the source record first.
How to improve
- Add more detail per row (owner, date, source) so the next report can trace each item.
- Add a second period of data so the next report can show whether things are improving.
Demo
Overview
Course generators will write plausible training on any topic, and that is exactly what makes them dangerous inside a company. A module about "our returns process" that describes a generic returns process teaches a new starter something false, and they act on it with a customer in week two.
This agent writes only from your documented procedures. Modules follow the steps your own material describes, in its order, using its terms. Assessment questions test whether someone could actually perform the task, not whether they can recall a definition — and every question traces to the passage it came from, so a disputed answer is settled by reading rather than arguing.
Its most useful output is the gap list: the steps your training needs that no document covers. Those are why onboarding takes six weeks and depends on one person being available, and no course generator has ever told you which they are.
Benefits
Onboarding stops depending on one person
The knowledge leaves their head and enters a document.
Training that matches reality
Because it was written from the procedure, not around it.
You learn what is undocumented
Usually the most valuable thing the exercise produces.
What it does
Only from your material
It will not describe a generic process in your company's name. What is not documented is not taught.
Names what nobody wrote down
The steps that exist only in someone's head — the reason onboarding depends on one person being free.
Questions that test the task
Whether someone could do it, not whether they can recall a definition.
Every answer traces to a passage
A disputed answer is settled by reading the source, not by arguing about it.
Flags contradictions
Where two of your documents describe the same step differently — which one is the new starter to believe?
Teaches nobody by itself
It produces material. Delivery and assessment decisions are yours.
What this changes
What this changes about your week
- It takes over
- Writing onboarding material from procedures nobody has assembled.
- Done today by
- The person who knows the job, who cannot be spared to write it down.
- How often
- Every new starter and every process change.
- Typical manual effort
- A proper module with assessment is days of an expert's time.
Why Education in particular. It writes only from your documents and names the steps nobody wrote down — which is why onboarding takes six weeks and depends on one person being free.
Runs unattended
Started by you or by an event, and it finishes on its own. Nothing waits for someone to be at a desk.
The same standard every time
The two-hundredth item is held to the bar the first one was. Consistency is the part people cannot sustain.
It cannot act on its own
Training & Onboarding Builder has no path to sending, spending or committing. That limit is why its output is safe to act on.
How it runs
This agent runs server-side through the PROMIVO runtime. Each run is logged step by step and every tool call is permission-checked before it executes.
- 1InputValidated against the agent input schema
- 2Modelclaude-sonnet-5 with automatic fallback
- 3Toolssearch_knowledge, extract_structured_data
- 4PermissionsRuns READ actions automatically; anything higher waits for approval
- 5OutputStructured result matching the output schema
- 6LoggingTokens, duration and every step recorded
Requirements
Integrations
No integrations required.
Before you start
- A knowledge base holding your procedures and policies
- The role or task the training is for
- Requires the Starter plan or higher
Use cases
New starter onboarding
A course from the procedures you already have.
A process change
Update the module from the updated document.
Documentation audit
Find out how much of the job is written down.
Pricing
Starter
Billed monthly through your PROMIVO subscription. Cancel at any time.
Runs consume your plan allowance for agent executions and tokens. See plan limits
FAQ
Can it write training on a topic we have no documents for?
No, and that refusal is the point. Generic training presented as your process is worse than no training, because the new starter believes it.
Does it grade people?
It produces questions and model answers. Assessing a person has employment consequences and stays with a person.
What if our documents disagree?
It reports the contradiction rather than picking one. Which version is correct is a decision for whoever owns the process.
Reviews
Reviews open once customers have run this agent.
Need this agent to work differently?
Tell us what to change and our team will scope a customised version for your business.
Customize this agent