Procurement

Supplier Risk Screener

Says what it checked, what it found, and what it could not check

Version 3Published Sep 2, 2026
Watch it work▶ Try it on your own figures — free

5 of 8 suppliers need attention.

8 suppliers checked. 5 flagged. The largest gap is 972 days.

Start with Gamma Chips. high has the most flagged.

How likely a supplier is to fail you is a judgement that needs more than these fields (finances, news, site visits).

$1.7M
5/8
Flagged
5
8
Annual spend at risk
$1.7M
Longest (days)
972
Share flagged
63%

Why rows were flagged

5
  • Certificate expired38%
  • No audit in 24 months38%
  • Single source in a high-risk country25%

Value flagged by Country risk

  • high$1.4M
  • medium$305K

Items to act on, worst first

ItemCountry riskValueDays expired or since auditWhy
Gamma Chipshigh$880K0Single source in a high-risk country
Alpha Metalshigh$420K880Certificate expired, Single source in a high-risk country, No audit in 24 months
Eta Textilehigh$130K29Certificate expired
Delta Packmedium$95K972Certificate expired, No audit in 24 months
Epsilon Foodsmedium$210K0No audit in 24 months

What to do this week

  • Resolve Gamma Chips first: it is the most urgent on the list.
  • Fix the data or the status on every flagged row, then re-run.
  • Re-run this check every time the list changes, before it reaches a decision.

Do

  • Fix the highest-risk item first, then run the check again on fresh data.

Don't

  • Don't act on one row alone: open the source record first.

How to improve

  • Add more detail per row (owner, date, source) so the next report can trace each item.
  • Add a second period of data so the next report can show whether things are improving.

Demo

Try it now — free

Type your figures (or fill in samples) and get the answer in a minute.

Start from a template

Make it decision-ready

Also include

No card · no API key · your figures are not stored

Overview

Supplier screening tools hand you a green tick, and the tick misrepresents what happened. Nothing found is not the same as nothing there — especially for a small supplier in a market whose company registry is not online, or one trading under a name that is not its legal one.

This agent reports honestly. What it checked, with sources. What it found, with dates. And what it could not check at all, which for many suppliers is the largest section and the one a buyer most needs to see.

It checks the things that actually go wrong: whether the entity you are contracting with is the one you think, whether it appears to be trading, whether anything public contradicts what it told you, and whether your own requirements — insurance, certifications, policies — are evidenced. It does not score suppliers, because a single number invites people to stop reading at the number.

Benefits

Catches the wrong-entity problem

The commonest and most expensive procurement fraud.

Honest coverage

You know what was actually verified, so you know what to ask.

Consistent across suppliers

The same checks and the same bar, every time.

What it does

  • Checks the entity is the entity

    The legal name on the contract against the one that trades and invoices. This is where fraud enters.

  • Sources and dates everything

    A finding without a source and a date is a rumour.

  • Reports what it could not check

    The most important section for suppliers in markets with no public registry.

  • Checks against your requirements

    Insurance, certifications, policies — whether each is actually evidenced or merely claimed.

  • Flags contradictions

    Where public information disagrees with what the supplier told you.

  • No score

    A single number is where people stop reading. It reports findings instead.

What this changes

What this changes about your week

It takes over
Checking a new supplier is the entity you think it is, and meets your requirements.
Done today by
Procurement, or nobody, before the first purchase order.
How often
Every onboarding and every large award.
Typical manual effort
A careful screen is an hour; most take five minutes.

Why Procurement in particular. It reports what it could not check as its own section. A green tick on a supplier in a market with no public registry misrepresents what was actually verified.

  • Runs unattended

    Started by you or by an event, and it finishes on its own. Nothing waits for someone to be at a desk.

  • The same standard every time

    The two-hundredth item is held to the bar the first one was. Consistency is the part people cannot sustain.

  • It cannot act on its own

    Supplier Risk Screener has no path to sending, spending or committing. That limit is why its output is safe to act on.

How it runs

This agent runs server-side through the PROMIVO runtime. Each run is logged step by step and every tool call is permission-checked before it executes.

  1. 1InputValidated against the agent input schema
  2. 2Modelclaude-sonnet-5 with automatic fallback
  3. 3Toolsfetch_web_page, extract_structured_data
  4. 4PermissionsRuns READ actions automatically; anything higher waits for approval
  5. 5OutputStructured result matching the output schema
  6. 6LoggingTokens, duration and every step recorded

Requirements

Integrations

No integrations required.

Before you start

  • The supplier's legal name and, ideally, registration number
  • Your own supplier requirements
  • Requires the All-Access plan or higher

Use cases

Before onboarding

Screen a new supplier before the first purchase order.

Before a large award

Deeper checks proportionate to what is at stake.

Periodic review

What has changed publicly since you onboarded them.

Pricing

All-Access

Billed monthly through your PROMIVO subscription. Cancel at any time.

Runs consume your plan allowance for agent executions and tokens. See plan limits

FAQ

Does it check sanctions lists?

No. Sanctions screening needs licensed, continuously updated data and a documented matching process. It reports the public information it found and says explicitly that sanctions screening was not performed.

Why no risk score?

Because a score is where people stop reading, and it hides the difference between 'checked and clean' and 'could not check'. Those are not the same, and no number can express both.

Can it clear a supplier?

No. It reports findings and gaps. Whether to trade with someone is a commercial decision with legal consequences, and it stays with a person.

Reviews

Reviews open once customers have run this agent.

Need this agent to work differently?

Tell us what to change and our team will scope a customised version for your business.

Customize this agent