Answers from what you can evidence, and flags every requirement you cannot
Tenders are lost on compliance, not on prose. The expensive failures are missing a mandatory requirement — disqualified on a technicality after three weeks of work — and answering "fully compliant" to something the company does not actually do, which wins a contract it then breaches.
This agent extracts every requirement, including the ones buried in an annex, and marks which are mandatory, which are scored, and which carry a page limit or a format rule that will get an answer rejected unread.
Then it drafts from your own evidence: past answers, policies, certifications, case studies, read from your knowledge base and cited. Where it cannot find evidence, it does not write a confident answer — it says the requirement is unevidenced and names what would answer it. That refusal is the product. A bid tool that writes fluent unsupported claims is generating liabilities on your letterhead.
The mandatory checklist, complete.
The library you already have, applied.
Every claim traceable to evidence.
Including the mandatory one in annex C that costs the bid when it is missed.
A missed mandatory is a disqualification. A weak scored answer is points. Different work.
Page limits, word counts, required attachments — answers get rejected unread over these.
Every answer cites the document behind it. No evidence, no claim.
The unevidenced list is the deliverable that saves the contract you should not have won.
Requirements you could meet but have not committed to, put to a person.
This agent runs server-side through the PROMIVO runtime. Each run is logged step by step and every tool call is permission-checked before it executes.
Demo dataIllustrative sample output, abridged.
{
"buyer": "City Transport Authority",
"tenderText": "…"
}{
"escalate": true,
"disclaimer": "Answers drafted from your evidence library, with sources. Nothing here is a compliance statement or a contractual commitment, and the response has not been submitted.",
"requirements": [
{
"type": "mandatory",
"status": "evidence-expired",
"reference": "4.2.1",
"requirement": "Supplier holds ISO 27001 certification covering the delivering entity.",
"sourceDocument": "ISO 27001 certificate — expired 2026-03-30",
"whatWouldAnswerIt": "A current certificate, or the recertification audit date in writing."
}
],
"escalationReason": "A mandatory certification requirement is evidenced only by an expired certificate.",
"mandatoryChecklist": [
{
"met": false,
"note": "Certificate on file expired in March. This disqualifies as written.",
"reference": "4.2.1"
}
]
}No integrations required.
Requirements extracted and drafted from your library.
See what you cannot evidence before committing three weeks.
The same problem in a shorter form.
$349/month
Billed monthly through your PROMIVO subscription. Cancel at any time.
Runs consume your plan allowance for agent executions and tokens. See plan limits.
Only where your own evidence says so, with a citation. Where it cannot find evidence it says the requirement is unevidenced. A confident unsupported 'yes' is how a bid becomes a breach.
Then most requirements come back unevidenced, and that is the honest answer — it also tells you exactly what to write once and reuse forever.
No. It drafts. Submission commits your business contractually and stays with a person.
No reviews yet. Reviews open once customers have run this agent.
Tell us what to change and our team will scope a customised version for your business.
Customize this agent