HealthcareFeatured

Medical Coding & Claims Auditor

Finds the reason the claim will be denied, before you submit it

Version 2Published Sep 2, 2026
Watch it work▶ Try it on your own figures — free

5 of 8 billed lines need attention.

8 billed lines checked. 5 flagged.

Start with CL-02 99,214. CL-06 has the most flagged.

Whether a code is the right one is for a certified coder; the list only checks format, documentation and counts.

5
5/8
Flagged
5
8
Flags
5
Longest (days)
12
Share flagged
63%

Why rows were flagged

5
  • Same code twice with a modifier40%
  • Not documented in the note20%
  • Code not in a known format20%
  • More than 10 units20%

Value flagged by Claim

  • CL-062
  • CL-021
  • CL-031
  • CL-041

Items to act on, worst first

ItemClaimValueUnits billedWhy
CL-02 99,214CL-0211Not documented in the note
CL-03 9,921CL-0311Code not in a known format
CL-04 97,110CL-04112More than 10 units
CL-06 93,000CL-0611Same code twice with a modifier
CL-06 93,000CL-0611Same code twice with a modifier

What to do this week

  • Resolve CL-02 99,214 first: it is the most urgent on the list.
  • Fix the data or the status on every flagged row, then re-run.
  • Re-run this check every time the list changes, before it reaches a decision.

Do

  • Fix the highest-risk item first, then run the check again on fresh data.

Don't

  • Don't act on one row alone: open the source record first.

How to improve

  • Add more detail per row (owner, date, source) so the next report can trace each item.
  • Add a second period of data so the next report can show whether things are improving.

Demo

Try it now — free

Type your figures (or fill in samples) and get the answer in a minute.

Start from a template

Make it decision-ready

Also include

No card · no API key · your figures are not stored

Overview

Most claim denials are administrative, not clinical: a code the note does not support, a missing modifier, an authorisation nobody obtained, a place-of-service mismatch. Each one is rework, and rework at volume is the largest avoidable cost in a billing operation.

This agent checks a coded claim before it goes out. It compares each code against what the documentation actually records, checks the claim against the payer rules in your knowledge base, and reports what would cause a denial — with the rule and the part of the note that does or does not support it.

It does not assign codes, does not diagnose, and does not assess whether treatment was appropriate. Those are a clinician's and a certified coder's work. It reads what was written and what the payer requires, and reports where they do not meet. Everything it produces goes to a person to act on.

Benefits

Fewer denials

Caught before submission, when fixing costs minutes instead of weeks.

Faster review

Coders see only claims with a flagged reason, each already evidenced.

A defensible record

Every flag traces to a rule and a line of the note.

What it does

  • Checks code against documentation

    Whether the note actually records what the code claims, quoting the part that does or does not.

  • Applies your payer's rules

    Read from your knowledge base, so it is that payer's policy rather than a generic ruleset.

  • Catches the administrative denials

    Missing modifiers, authorisations, place-of-service mismatches, and required attachments.

  • Separates unsupported from undocumented

    A code the note contradicts and a code the note is silent on are different problems with different fixes.

  • Assigns nothing

    It reports; a certified coder decides. Coding is a credentialed act and stays one.

  • Never clinical

    No diagnosis, no assessment of whether care was appropriate.

What this changes

What this changes about your week

It takes over
Checking coded claims against documentation and the payer's own rules before submission.
Done today by
Certified coders, at the limit of their capacity.
How often
Every claim batch.
Typical manual effort
A pre-submission scrub of a batch is hours.

Why Healthcare in particular. Most denials are administrative, not clinical. Rework at volume is the largest avoidable cost in a billing operation.

  • Runs unattended

    Started by you or by an event, and it finishes on its own. Nothing waits for someone to be at a desk.

  • The same standard every time

    The two-hundredth item is held to the bar the first one was. Consistency is the part people cannot sustain.

  • It cannot act on its own

    Medical Coding & Claims Auditor has no path to sending, spending or committing. That limit is why its output is safe to act on.

How it runs

This agent runs server-side through the PROMIVO runtime. Each run is logged step by step and every tool call is permission-checked before it executes.

  1. 1InputValidated against the agent input schema
  2. 2Modelclaude-opus-5 with automatic fallback
  3. 3Toolssearch_knowledge, extract_structured_data
  4. 4PermissionsRuns READ actions automatically; anything higher waits for approval
  5. 5OutputStructured result matching the output schema
  6. 6LoggingTokens, duration and every step recorded

Requirements

Integrations

No integrations required.

Before you start

  • The coded claim and the supporting documentation
  • A knowledge base holding the payer's policies and coding requirements
  • Requires the All-Access plan or higher

Use cases

Pre-submission scrub

Check the batch before it goes to the payer.

Denial analysis

Find the pattern behind a run of denials.

Documentation feedback

Show clinicians which notes routinely fail to support coding.

Pricing

All-Access

Billed monthly through your PROMIVO subscription. Cancel at any time.

Runs consume your plan allowance for agent executions and tokens. See plan limits

FAQ

Does it assign codes?

No. Coding is a credentialed act with legal weight. It checks codes already assigned against documentation and payer rules, and reports discrepancies for a coder to resolve.

Is this clinical?

No. It never diagnoses, never assesses whether care was appropriate, and never comments on a clinician's decisions. It reads what was documented and what the payer requires.

What about patient data?

Supply de-identified records wherever possible; the audit works from documentation and codes, not from identity. Your own handling of protected health information remains your responsibility, and this agent does not transmit records anywhere.

What if we have no payer rules loaded?

It checks documentation support only and says the payer check could not be performed. It will not substitute a generic ruleset for the payer's own.

Reviews

Reviews open once customers have run this agent.

Need this agent to work differently?

Tell us what to change and our team will scope a customised version for your business.

Customize this agent